International Journal of Animal Science and Technology

Submit a Manuscript

Publishing with us to make your research visible to the widest possible audience.

Propose a Special Issue

Building a community of authors and readers to discuss the latest research and develop new ideas.

Research Article |

Effect of Ground Nut Cake Supplement on Milk Production Performances and Economic Return of Dairy Cows

A study was conducted to evaluate the feeding value of ground nut cake (GNC) with concentrate feeds on milk yield and its economic feasibility. Changeover design was used in three periods each comprising 25 days plus the first seven days for adaptation and ten days for wash out of residual effect between consecutive periods. Treatment diet was ground nut cake (GNC) while soya bean meal (SBM) was used as control levelled at a ratio of 0 GNC: 100 SBM (T1), 50 GNC: 50 SBM (T2) and 100 GNC: 0 SBM (T3). The concentrate diets were maize, wheat bran, minerals and vitamin premix while basal diets grass hay and corn silage were fed ad libitum. Data were analysed using the General Linear Models procedure of SAS. Daily milk yield was higher (P<0.05) for T3 (18.71 l/d) and T2 (18.17 l/d) as compared to T1 (17.96 l/d). Milk yield differed (P<0.05) between treatments with stages of lactation. Economic analysis showed the highest net return for T3 and the lowest from T2. In general, Replacement of ground nut cake for soybean meal improved milk yield and economic return.

Cake, Effect, Milk, Ground Nut Cake, Performance, Soybean

APA Style

Aleli, A. T. (2024). Effect of Ground Nut Cake Supplement on Milk Production Performances and Economic Return of Dairy Cows. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 8(1), 1-7.

ACS Style

Aleli, A. T. Effect of Ground Nut Cake Supplement on Milk Production Performances and Economic Return of Dairy Cows. Int. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2024, 8(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20240801.11

AMA Style

Aleli AT. Effect of Ground Nut Cake Supplement on Milk Production Performances and Economic Return of Dairy Cows. Int J Anim Sci Technol. 2024;8(1):1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20240801.11

Copyright © 2023 Authors retain the copyright of this article.
This article is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License ( which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

1. Ministry of Economic Development and Cooperation (1999). Survey of the Ethiopian Economy: Review of Post Reform Developments 1992/3-1997/8. Ministry of Economic Development and Cooperation, Addis Ababa.
2. Inter-Governmental Authority on Development of livestock policy Institute (IGAD-LPI). 2011. The contribution of livestock to the Ethiopian Economy part-I.
3. CSA (Central statistical agency). 2016/17. Agricultural sample survey, Volume II Report on Livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings), Statistical bulletin 585, Federal democratic republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa 9-22pp.
4. Zelalem Yılma, Emmanuelle Guernebleich and Ameha sebsibe. 2011. A review of Ethiopian Dairy sector. FAO Sub Regional office for Eastern Africa: 13-15.
5. Azage Tegegne, Birhanu Gebremedhin and Dirk H. 2006. Input supply system and services for market-oriented livestock production in Ethiopia, ESAP (Ethiopian Society of Animal Production), 2006. Institutional arrangements and challenges in market-oriented livestock agriculture in Ethiopia. Proceedings of the 14th annual conference of Ethiopian Society of Animal Production (ESAP) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, September 5-7, 2006 Part I: Plenary session.
6. FAO (Food and Agricultural organization for United Nation). 1990. Agricultural commodities: Profiles and relevant WTO negotiation issues, Background Document for the consultation on Agricultural Commodity Price Problems, 25-26 March 1990, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.
7. FAO (Food and Agricultural organization for United Nation), 2004. Livestock Information, Sector Analysis and Policy Branch. Livestock sector brief, Ethiopia pp. 1-18.
8. Aynalem Haile, Workneh Ayalew, Noah Kebede, Tadela Dessie and Azage Tegegne. 2010. Improving productivity and success of Ethiopian farmers’ project-International Livestock Research Institute (ILRI) Addis Ababa Ethiopia.
9. Belay Degum, Yisehak, Geert, P. 2011. Analysis of constraints facing urban dairy farmers and gender responsibility in animal management in Jimma Town. African Journal of Basic Applied Science, 3: 313–318.
10. CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2013. Agricultural Sample Survey, Volume II: Report on Livestock and livestock characteristics (Private peasant holdings), Statistical Bulletin 570. Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa.
11. Seyoum Bediye, Getinet Assefa, and Abate Taadella. 2001. Present status and future direction of feed resource and nutrition research targeted for wheat based crop livestock production system in Ethiopia. Proceeding workshop on improving wheat based crop livestock production system in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 207-226.
12. FAO (Food and Agricultural organization for United Nation), 2010. Livestock Sector and Policies and programs in developing countries- a menu for practitioners Rome, pp. 150.
13. National Research Council. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. Seventh Edition Washington, D.C. National Academic Press, 2001.
14. Wu, Z. and Satter, L. 2000. Milk production during the complete lactation of dairy cows fed diets containing different amounts of protein. Journal of Dairy Science, 83: 1042-1051.
15. Harris, B. 1992. Nutrient requirements of dairy cattle. Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Reviewed, 2003.
16. Mulugeta Abera. 2015. Evaluation of Effective Microbes Treatment on Chemical Composition of Crop Residues and Performance of Crossbred Dairy Cows. MSc thesis presented to scool of Graduate Studies, Haramaya University, Ethiopia 32p.
17. Forben, J. M. and Provenza, F. D. 2000. Integration of learning and metabolic signals into a theory of dietary choice and feed intake. Ruminant Physiology, Digestion, Metabolism, Growth and Reproduction. CAB International, pp. 3-19.
18. Palmer, J. M. 2010. The use of peanut by products in stocker cattle diets. A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama. 29-34p.
19. NMSA (National Meteorology Service Agency). 2007. Meteorology report: Addis Ababa.
20. Gizat, A. 2004. A cross-sectional study of bovine mastitis in and around Bahirdar and antibiotic resistance patterns of major pathogens. MSc Thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Debre Zeit, Ethiopia 35p.
21. National Research Council. 2000. Nutrient Requirements of Beef Cattle. 7th Revised Edition Washington, D.C. National Academies Press, 2000.
22. Reid, D. and Johnson, A. 2008. Trouble shooting herds with poor teat condition. National Council Web site, Accessed, February 2008.
23. Whelan, S. 2014. Effect of dietary manipulation of crude protein content on early lactating dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 97: 7220-7224.
24. Proma, S., Puangdeec, S. and Cheva-Isarakul, B. 2002. The proper level of energy and protein for medium milk production of Holstein Friesian crossbred cows fed ruzi silage as source of roughage. Proceeding of 40th Annual Conference, Bangkok, Thailand: 163-171pp.
25. Bach, A., Huntington, G., Calsamiglia, S. and Stern M. 2000. Nitrogen metabolism of early lactation cows fed diets with two different levels of protein and different amino acid profiles. Journal of Dairy Science, 83: 2585-2595.
26. Steinshamn, H. 2010. Effect of forage legumes on feed intake, milk production and milk quality a review. Animal Science Papers and Reports. 28(3): 195-206.
27. Brito, A. and Broderick A. G. 2007. Effect of different protein supplement on milk production and nutrient utilization in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 1816-1827.
28. Yogi Surabh, Sahu Sambhuti and Jaisubal Sudheer. 2017. Correlation between milk constituent Holstein Frisian cattle. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 9(7): 3840-3842.
29. Rastan, R., Andrew, M., Zinn, A. and Sniffen. J. 2001. Body Composition and Estimated Tissue Energy Balance in Jersey and Holstein cows during early lactation, Journal of Dairy Science, 84: 1201–1209.
30. Maria Ximena and Tolosa Alvarez. 2002. Comparison of milking characteristics and feed conversion efficiency of two level of Holstein Frisian cows which differs genetically. An MSc thesis presented to Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. 107p.
31. Wholf, C. 2010. Understanding the milk to feed price ratio as a proxy for dairy farm profitability. Journal of Dairy Science, 93(10): 4942-4948.
32. Buza, M., Holden, L., White, R., Ishler, V. 2014. Evaluating the effect of ration composition on income over feed cost and milk yield. Journal of Dairy Science, 97(5): 3073-3080.
33. Sharkerer, N. 2008. Economics of Milk Production in West Bengal: Evidence from Cooperative and non-cooperative Farms. Journal of Economics and Business, 11: 1. solvita.
34. Schulte Kristen and Dhuyvetter Kevin. 2010. Factors Impacting Dairy Profitability: Analysis of Kansas Farm Management Association Dairy Enterprise, Kansas State University.
35. Yurdakul, O. 1978. Economic structure of dairy farms and milk marketing and consumption in Adana province. Associate professorship dissertation: Cukurova University, Adana 34-35p.
36. Raju Kumawat. 2014. Economic Analysis of Cost and Returns of Milk Production, Extent of Adoption of Recommended Management Practices on Sample Dairy Farms in Bikaner District of Rajasthan. Global Journal of Science Frontier Research, 14: 5.
37. Varian, R. 1992. Microeconomic Analysis. Norton, New York, USA. 124p.
38. Yildiz, E. 2014. The comparison of the main protein sources for dairy cows. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 20(2): 428-446.